<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sculptural Objects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chicagoartmagazine.com/2010/08/sculptural-objects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chicagoartmagazine.com/2010/08/sculptural-objects/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia Giachetti</title>
		<link>http://chicagoartmagazine.com/2010/08/sculptural-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-851</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia Giachetti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 00:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoartmagazine.com/?p=3276#comment-851</guid>
		<description>beautiful work! I ordered Nick Cave&#039;s Catalog and can&#039;t wait to see more of his fabulous work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>beautiful work! I ordered Nick Cave&#8217;s Catalog and can&#8217;t wait to see more of his fabulous work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn Born</title>
		<link>http://chicagoartmagazine.com/2010/08/sculptural-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn Born</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 02:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoartmagazine.com/?p=3276#comment-291</guid>
		<description>Hiya. These are bigger images, but just tossed in. Everyone is learning how to upload. 

Thx for the heads up!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiya. These are bigger images, but just tossed in. Everyone is learning how to upload. </p>
<p>Thx for the heads up!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.</title>
		<link>http://chicagoartmagazine.com/2010/08/sculptural-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoartmagazine.com/?p=3276#comment-290</guid>
		<description>It is interesting to read a little what artists designers are trying to express... that they do not design any wearable clothes, but for them &quot;the key is not comfort, but artistic representation.&quot; I really like this last sentence. &#039;Average me&#039;, can finally understand what this is all about...

Also it is great to read about SAIC&#039;s fashion show, that it is so unique. Certainly it would be worth to go to see it.

Finally the last paragraph is just great. I totally agree with you... it is so sad, how art is perceived by famous names, not art itself. 

I have one negative comment... the pictures could be bigger with better quality, when I click at them... the reader can see only miniature pictures and because of it is difficult to appreciate it. (of course I can search for it, but it would so much easier just click on it) It is probably more technological problem, so I assume it might not be your fault.

Great and interesting article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting to read a little what artists designers are trying to express&#8230; that they do not design any wearable clothes, but for them &#8220;the key is not comfort, but artistic representation.&#8221; I really like this last sentence. &#8216;Average me&#8217;, can finally understand what this is all about&#8230;</p>
<p>Also it is great to read about SAIC&#8217;s fashion show, that it is so unique. Certainly it would be worth to go to see it.</p>
<p>Finally the last paragraph is just great. I totally agree with you&#8230; it is so sad, how art is perceived by famous names, not art itself. </p>
<p>I have one negative comment&#8230; the pictures could be bigger with better quality, when I click at them&#8230; the reader can see only miniature pictures and because of it is difficult to appreciate it. (of course I can search for it, but it would so much easier just click on it) It is probably more technological problem, so I assume it might not be your fault.</p>
<p>Great and interesting article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

