<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An interview with Donald Kuspit (Part 3)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chicagoartmagazine.com/2010/01/kuspit-thodos-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chicagoartmagazine.com/2010/01/kuspit-thodos-3/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Sakkal</title>
		<link>http://chicagoartmagazine.com/2010/01/kuspit-thodos-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1160</link>
		<dc:creator>George Sakkal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 22:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoartmagazine.com/?p=1654#comment-1160</guid>
		<description>In the 2009 summer edition of the American Arts Quarterly journal my eassy, &quot;The Problem with Post Modern Art: The Visual versus the Conceptual &quot; was published. It was a denunciation of Marcel Duchamp&#039;s conscious mind/conceptual theory of art. Two editions previously an essay by Dr. Donald Kuspit appeared in the same journal. We share very strong beliefs on the importance of the unconscious mind in the creation of art. In March I shall appear as a lecturer, presenter at Art Expo in New York and would like to invite Dr. Kuspit to attend. The lecture for the very first time will adapt and apply recent scientific research findings from the fields of cognitive psychology and the neurosciences that prove conclusively the unconcious mind is cognitive and enormously superior creatively to the unconscious mind. It will also prove conclusively that Duchamp&#039;s conceptual theory of art is nothing more than a hoax and shares no relatitionship with the reality of human creativity. The presentation is thought provoking at least and revolutionary at best and dear to the heart of Dr. Kuspit. Can you put him in contact with me? I tried unsuccessful in my attempts to contact him thru NYU at Stonybrook where he is on their faculty.  Please, can you assist me. Thank you. George  Sakkal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the 2009 summer edition of the American Arts Quarterly journal my eassy, &#8220;The Problem with Post Modern Art: The Visual versus the Conceptual &#8221; was published. It was a denunciation of Marcel Duchamp&#8217;s conscious mind/conceptual theory of art. Two editions previously an essay by Dr. Donald Kuspit appeared in the same journal. We share very strong beliefs on the importance of the unconscious mind in the creation of art. In March I shall appear as a lecturer, presenter at Art Expo in New York and would like to invite Dr. Kuspit to attend. The lecture for the very first time will adapt and apply recent scientific research findings from the fields of cognitive psychology and the neurosciences that prove conclusively the unconcious mind is cognitive and enormously superior creatively to the unconscious mind. It will also prove conclusively that Duchamp&#8217;s conceptual theory of art is nothing more than a hoax and shares no relatitionship with the reality of human creativity. The presentation is thought provoking at least and revolutionary at best and dear to the heart of Dr. Kuspit. Can you put him in contact with me? I tried unsuccessful in my attempts to contact him thru NYU at Stonybrook where he is on their faculty.  Please, can you assist me. Thank you. George  Sakkal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

