<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Interview with Donald Kuspit (Part 1)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chicagoartmagazine.com/2009/11/an-interview-with-donald-kuspit-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chicagoartmagazine.com/2009/11/an-interview-with-donald-kuspit-part-1/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Link</title>
		<link>http://chicagoartmagazine.com/2009/11/an-interview-with-donald-kuspit-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>John Link</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoartmagazine.com/?p=1235#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Kuspit&#039;s association of &quot;perpetual redefinition&quot; with instability and annihilation is very perceptive.

That certain segments of the art world are constantly attempting to &quot;redefine&quot; art is a sign they are bored with the real thing, or perhaps do not even have the ability to recognize it when they see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kuspit&#8217;s association of &#8220;perpetual redefinition&#8221; with instability and annihilation is very perceptive.</p>
<p>That certain segments of the art world are constantly attempting to &#8220;redefine&#8221; art is a sign they are bored with the real thing, or perhaps do not even have the ability to recognize it when they see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

